How to Tell an Employee They're Being Made Redundant (A Practical, Humane Guide)
21 Aug 2026 · 7 min read
There's a moment I've watched dozens of times in practice transcripts. A manager is rehearsing a redundancy conversation, in a simulation, with nothing at stake, and they still can't say the word.
They say "changes to the structure". They say "your role is affected". They say "we're entering a consultation process about the shape of the team". Four sentences in, the person opposite them still doesn't know they're losing their job.
I build conversation simulations at Real Talk Studio, and the redundancy conversation is one of the hardest we've ever built, because it's one of the hardest that exists. This guide covers how to do it as well as it can be done: the structure, the exact sentences, the mistakes I see in rehearsal after rehearsal, and what happens with the rest of the team afterwards.
One boundary first: this is a guide to the conversation, not the law. Redundancy processes carry real legal requirements that differ by country (consultation rules in the UK, WARN and state rules in the US, and so on). Get the process right with HR and legal advice before any conversation happens. What follows assumes the process is sound and focuses on the part no process document covers: the fifteen minutes in the room.
In the UK this conversation is usually called redundancy. In the US it's more often a layoff or a termination meeting. The legal wrapper changes. The human part does not: someone has to say the sentence, then sit in the silence after it.
The one principle: directness is the kindness
Everything in this guide follows from a single idea, and it's the opposite of most managers' instinct.
The instinct is to soften. Warm up slowly, cushion with praise, approach the news sideways. It feels kind. It isn't. Every sentence before the news is a sentence in which the other person's life hasn't changed yet, and they will replay this meeting later and know you were stalling. Softening protects the manager's feelings, not the employee's.
The kindest version of this conversation is the most direct one, delivered with genuine warmth, followed by genuine space. That's the whole method. The rest is detail.
Kim Scott would call this radical candor: care personally, challenge directly. This is that idea at its sharpest.
Before the conversation
- Know everything answerable. Notice period, pay, what happens to their equipment and email, when their last day is, what support exists. "I'll have to check" on basic questions makes a bad meeting worse.
- Know what you don't know, and decide to say so. There will be questions without answers yet. Plan the honest sentence: "I don't know that yet. You'll have it by Friday."
- Rehearse the first sentence out loud. Not in your head. Your head lets you skip the hard word. Out loud, you'll discover whether you can actually say "redundant", and if you can't yet, that's what rehearsal is for. This is precisely why we built a redundancy scenario people can practise privately, because the first time you say that sentence should not be to the person it's about.
- Book the room and the time like it matters. Private, early in the day, early in the week, never a Friday afternoon, and never an ambush at the end of another meeting.
The conversation itself: a structure that holds
1. The news, inside the first thirty seconds
One sentence of framing, then the news, with the actual word in it.
"Thanks for coming in. I have difficult news and I'm going to be direct with you. Your role is being made redundant."
That's it. No compliment sandwich, no ten minutes of context first. The context comes after, when they can actually hear it.
If you are in the US and the language is layoff rather than redundancy, keep the same structure and use the word your process actually uses. "Your position is being eliminated." "You are being laid off." Hedging the noun does not make the meeting kinder.
2. The pause you'll want to fill
Then stop talking. This is the moment every rehearsal transcript shows managers fumbling: the silence feels unbearable, so they fill it with justification, process detail, or worse, reassurance-babble. The person has just had their footing removed. Let them have the silence. Ten seconds feels like an hour. Hold it anyway.
3. The reason, briefly and honestly
Give the real reason in two or three sentences. Not a spreadsheet, not a speech about market conditions, and absolutely no "this is hard for me too". If the selection wasn't about their performance, say so plainly, because they will be wondering, and that doubt is corrosive: "This is about the role, not your work. I want that to be completely clear."
4. Their reaction, whatever it is
People cry, go silent, get angry, or go eerily business-like. All of it is fine and none of it needs fixing. The mistakes here are symmetrical: talking over emotion with process, or getting pulled into defending a decision that isn't reversible in this room. Acknowledge, don't argue: "I understand you're angry. You're entitled to be."
5. The practical next steps
When they're able to hear it, and not before: what happens now, the dates, the money, the support, and who they can talk to. Put it in writing too, because almost nothing said after the first sentence gets retained. End with one concrete next step and a named point of contact.
The sentences to avoid
From real rehearsals, the phrases that make it worse:
- "This is really hard for me." It's harder for them. Never compare.
- "I'm sure you'll land on your feet." A promise you can't cash and a subject-change from their loss.
- "If it were up to me..." Distancing yourself from the decision abandons them to a faceless company. In this room, you are the company.
- "I'm sorry if this comes as a shock." The "if" is doing shabby work. It is a shock. "I'm sorry, I know this is a shock."
- Anything in the passive voice. "The decision has been made" hides every human being involved. Own the sentence.
Afterwards: the conversation with everyone else
The redundancy conversation has a second act that most guides skip: an hour later, you're in front of the rest of the team, and the room doesn't take turns.
We built a team simulation of exactly this meeting, with four AI characters modelled on what real rooms do: someone scared, asking for numbers you don't have; someone angry, looking for a person to blame; someone who's gone quiet and checked out; and someone loudly insisting it's fine, which somehow lands worst of all.
What works in that room is the same principle scaled up: say what's true, hold the line on what you don't know, and give the next concrete step with a date on it. What fails is spin. Any gap between what you say and what the team can see gets filled with the worst available interpretation, and your credibility funds the difference.
That second meeting is also one of the five conversations I wish every new manager rehearsed before year one. It sits alongside the other difficult conversations managers actually freeze on.
Practise it before it's real
You wouldn't deliver a career-defining presentation without a run-through. This conversation defines someone else's career, and most managers walk in cold.
Rehearse it. Out loud, against something that reacts: a trusted peer, an HR partner playing the part properly, or an AI simulation where you can fumble the word "redundant" in private, hear how the softened version actually sounds, and try again until the direct, humane version is the one that comes out under pressure. The person on the other side of the desk deserves your tenth attempt, not your first.
Toby Sinclair is the founder of Real Talk Studio, an AI conversation simulation platform. He designs and studies practice scenarios for the workplace's hardest conversations, including redundancy and termination meetings, and is an ICF Professional Certified Coach. This article is practical guidance, not legal advice.
Practice, not theory
Reading about the conversation isn't practising it.
Real Talk Studio is the driving test — try the same conversation against an AI counterpart before it happens for real.